🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to ban social media access for those under 16 is sparking debate internationally. Officials, safety advocates, and parents are watching closely to see if this tactic will set a precedent for countries abroad.

The European Momentum

Across Europe, a growing group of countries are moving toward parallel restrictions.

• The Danish government has stated a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister declaring that phones and platforms are "robbing our kids' youth". The policy is expected to be enacted soon.
• Norway is planning to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to shield young people from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to confirm the identity and age of social media account holders. The media minister have indicated that an Australian-model ban could be "an options on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged the legislature to pass a proposal raising the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has endorsed a comparable action, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Netherlands has recommended families to block their children from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has approved a advisory statement supporting a ban for under-16s without a parent decides otherwise is given. Even though it highlights of the "habit-forming" quality of these services, the step does not create enforceable legislation.

"A clear age limit is a solid foundation," stated a leading MEP driving the initiative.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Eye

For the United Kingdom, the government has kept open a potential ban, arguing that "no option is being dismissed" but stressing any decision must be "based on robust evidence".

Last year, interest grew behind a proposal to introduce limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately watered down. Instead, the government vowed to investigate the matter.

Advocacy groups have expressed concerns. An organization founded by the family of a girl who was lost after viewing dangerous social media material contends that a simple age ban could fail to protect children and could create a "dangerous transition" of risk when young people become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to create tools that are secure and fit for minors," stated a leading peer.

America: A State-by-State Approach

In the United States, legislation is largely occurring at the local government level amid national stalemate.

• Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• The state of Florida has signed a bill banning children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has approved a rule limiting minors to one hour of social media use per day, with additional time needing adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise passed laws mandating guardian approval for under-16s to create social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and calls from various individuals to follow Australia's lead, a federal ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Apart from the West, further states are likewise considering moves.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the access age for Instagram to 16.

But, global bodies adopt a more measured stance. Unicef has advised that age-based restrictions have downsides and "could prove counterproductive". The organization points out that online platforms can be a "critical link" for vulnerable youth and that bans should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to prioritize user protection.

Even as this worldwide discussion continues, the actions of Australia and several other countries show that governments internationally are no longer content to stand by for tech companies to act voluntarily.